 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
are through to be, if he has talent, squandering his talents, or if he has none, thought to be working with the only
congregation who would tolerate him? The answer to this question is not something of which I am certain, but the
thought does indeed exist among many brethren, and by many in the world as well. First, let me say that this thought
is not only illogical, but unscriptural, not to mention it is an expression of an improper understanding.
Let us take note of the fact that some of Jesus’ best teachings took place with only a few in His presence. The great
lesson of humility and service, which was taught in the manner of foot washing, only involved the apostles (John 13).
Several of the most quoted verses of Scripture are taken from John 3, which was a lesson Jesus taught to only one
man (3:1). If Jesus was not ashamed to speak to few in number, and if He thought they were worthy of the things He
had to say, why would we today think that to speak to only a few in number would be squandering talents? In fact, it
is the smaller congregations who are in most need of men with greater ability, for the smaller congregations are in
most need of growth.
When the Jews were restored from Babylonian captivity and the temple was being rebuilt, once the foundation had
been set, many wept, for the size of the temple of was much smaller than it had been before. Yet God, speaking
through His prophet Zechariah said, “For who hath despised the day of small things” (4:10). What this meant is
obvious: Just because it is small does not mean it is not glorious. Borrowing this language we ask: Who dares
despise small congregations?
The great Alexander Campbell, a man whose talents are unparalleled to this day, never had any more than 60 in
attendance where he regularly preached. By the standards of some, he was squandering his talents. Why so? Are
not smaller congregations in need of spiritual instruction? Are not those in smaller congregations just as dedicated,
and just as important as those in larger ones?
One of the most spiritually minded, intellectually strong congregations of which I am aware is the one with whom I
labor, which is small in number. Our attendance rarely breaks 40 and our actual membership is but 23. Though
small in number, we are mighty in works, and even mightier in the glory we bring to the Father. It is my earnest
desire that those who “despise” the small congregations will better learn humility.
